Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the time tolled for exhaustion of state remedies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) includes the interval between the disposition of an appeal or post-conviction petition and the filing of an appeal or successive petition at the next state appellate level. We conclude that, for purposes of § 2244(d), the time must be tolled for the entire period in which a petitioner is appropriately pursuing and exhausting his state remedies. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s dismissal of petitioner’s habeas corpus petition as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by479 opinions
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Donald Ray Patterson v. Terry L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Dale Swartz v. Meyers, Superintendent Pennsylvania Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
474 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.