Legal Opinion

Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1999No. 98-55563PublishedCited by 479 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the time tolled for exhaustion of state remedies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) includes the interval between the disposition of an appeal or post-conviction petition and the filing of an appeal or successive petition at the next state appellate level. We conclude that, for purposes of § 2244(d), the time must be tolled for the entire period in which a petitioner is appropriately pursuing and exhausting his state remedies. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s dismissal of petitioner’s habeas corpus petition as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by479 opinions

  1. Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Donald Ray Patterson v. Terry L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Dale Swartz v. Meyers, Superintendent Pennsylvania Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

474 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API