Legal Opinion

Bingham v. McGehee

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

Petition for mandamus against a county superintendent of schools to require him to countersign a school warrant under the provisions of an act of the Legislature of 1931. The defense to the suit was that the warrant was illegally issued. The writ was granted, and the county superintendent has appealed. As defined by our statute and construed by this court, mandamus will issue whenever the refusal or failure of an officer to act in a matter, in which it is his plain duty to act, may deprive one of his legal rights. Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 7021. Maddox v. Neal, 45 Ark. 121; Snapp v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maddox v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Otis & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Snapp v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Board of Improvement v. McManusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. Shackleford v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nethercutt v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Oster v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Special School District of Fort Smith v. LynchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API