Legal Opinion

Nethercutt v. Pulaski County Special School District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 1970No. 5-5174PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellants are public school teachers whose individual contracts were not renewed by appellee for the academic year 1969-70. Appellants alleged in their consolidated and amended complaints that they had invested many years of work and training, together with large sums of money, qualifying themselves “to pursue the teaching profession;” that their right to pursue their profession is “a valuable property right;” that if their teaching careers are terminated, each would be ineligible to continue membership in the Teachers Retirement System in which they have a direct…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marvel v. State ex rel. MorrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Patterson v. McKaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Otis & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. German National Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Faulkner Lake Drainage District v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. ShipleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Springdale Board of Education v. BowmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Springdale School District v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Burgess v. Four States Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API