Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Special School District of Fort Smith v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 24, 1967No. 5-4158Published

1ConcurrenceJohN A. FoglbmaN, Justice

I concur in the result, but I would reverse and dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The chancery court is totally devoid of jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus, which appellee admitted was the only remedy sought. I am not unmindful of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 33-101 (Repl. 1962) which is § 1 of Act 54 of 1939, but it is patently unconstitutional. It violates Article 7, §§ 11 and 15. The former provides that the circuit court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of all civil and criminal cases, the exclusive jurisdiction of which may not be vested in some other court provided for by the Constitution.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. MabrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Catlett v. Republican Party of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Hester v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Gladish v. LovewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Miller v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API