Oster v. Jones
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellee recovered judgment for $2,000 against appellant to compensate a personal injury. For tbe reversal of this judgment, it is insisted that the court erred in giving an instruction numbered 3 at the request of appellee and in refusing to give an instruction numbered 4 requested by appellant. It is also insisted that the verdict is excessive.
The nature of the case and the respective theories upon which it was tried will sufficiently appear from these instructions. Instruction numbered 3, given over the objection and exceptions of appellant, reads as follows: “In this case one of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Madison Smith Cadillac Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Schlosberg v. DoupSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Bingham v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932