Legal Opinion

Raytheon Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 26, 2012No. 09-306CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

We ruled in this case that a contracting officer’s final decision was barred by the statute of limitations where it was issued more than six years after the Government’s claim accrued in 1999. See Raytheon Co. v. United States, 104 Fed.Cl. 327 (2012). Defendant filed a motion for reconsideration, contending that a statute of limitations does not begin to run against the United States until a right granted by FAR to audit plaintiffs claim is completed, citing 48 C.F.R. § 31.201-2.1

Reconsideration is appropriate only in “extraordinary circumstances.” Fru-Con…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States 09-844c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API