Legal Opinion
Raytheon Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 22, 2012No. 09-306CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiff Raytheon Company acquired Hughes Aircraft in 1997. Among the assets and liabilities that Raytheon assumed with the purchase was sponsorship of two retirement plans from which funds had been distributed improperly. This was a tax issue that became subject to a Voluntary Compliance Resolution between Hughes and the Internal Revenue Service. The purpose and the effect of the 1998 Compliance Resolution was to settle Hughes’ obligations to IRS and to preserve the plans’ special tax status.1
The calculation of allowable, allocable, and reasonable costs that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- I.K. Frazer, Margie P. Berger, Peggy Cothren Jasso, Michael P. Dear, Stewart M. Kenderdine, Edwin Gaston, Jr. And Janice Colley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ingrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- RAM Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
3Cited by6 opinions
- Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States 09-844c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Al-Juthoor Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.