Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Bramblett
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1962No. 6928PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. T. Phelps, Justice
(retired).
This' is an action brought by plaintiff-appellant in this state against defendantsappellees to recover the sum of $9,645.54 together ■'with interest, for legal services rendered over a period of years. The parties will hereinafter be designated as plaintiff and defendants. The defendants were members of a limited partnership with headquarters in Fresno, California, operating under the name of The Kipling Syndicate.
The complaint in the instant case contains two counts: one based on a stated account and the second on an open account for legal services and for money advanced to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Fischer v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Chittenden & Eastman Co. v. Leader Furniture Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Kunselman v. Southern Pacific RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Wilson v. J. BramblettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael S. FISHER and Meryle Fisher, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Ross v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Windauer v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5860Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.