Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Hammons

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1927No. Civil No. 2596PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the petition of G. Fischer, hereinafter called appellant, to have certain promissory notes signed by him, and held by appellee, A. T. Hammons, superintendent of banks, as receiver of the Bank of Jerome, an insolvent banking corporation, hereinafter called the bank, declared void and of no effect as to him, and to have his signature thereon canceled.

The petition, after setting up the formal matters necessary, alleges, in substance, as follows: At the time the bank closed its doors, appellant was indebted to it on a note of his own in the sum of $1,000,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tevis v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Connor Livestock Co. v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Tevis v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Roach v. PrivettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. State ex rel. Young v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Taylor v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Kerby v. State Ex Rel. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Meyer v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API