Legal Opinion

Wilson v. J. Bramblett

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1957No. Civ. No. 5399PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff and appellant W. Francis Wilson, an attorney at law in Phoenix, Arizona, brought this action against certain named defendants, including respondents J. Newton Bramblett, Frank J. Stefanieh, Stuart M. White, James G. Huebner, Tim Mazzoni, and F. M. Hammaek, to recover on a promissory note for $9,845.54, alleged to have been executed on August 30, 1951, by defendant C. M. S. Kipling (not served) and respondent Stefanieh. It was subsequently signed by C. M. S. Kipling, as general partner, under the typewritten title “The Kipling Syndicate.” The note was for claimed attorneys’ fees…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Silva v. GordoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Allen's Collection Agency v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Harper v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Peterson v. MatchinskeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Rogers v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Wilson v. BramblettArizona Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API