Legal Opinion

San Jose Crane & Rigging, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1991No. H006308PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COTTLE, J.

Plaintiff insureds appeal from a judgment entered after the court granted defendant insurer’s motion for summary judgment. The sole issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs’ suit is barred by the one-year limitation clause contained in the parties’ insurance policy. We conclude that it is not.

In Prudential-LMI Com. Insurance v. Superior Court (1990) 51 Cal.3d 674 [274 Cal.Rptr. 387, 798 P.2d 1230], the Supreme Court held that in a first party progressive loss claim in the context of a homeowner’s insurance policy the one-year limitation period should be tolled from the date…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. Tom Thomas Organization, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mock v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. DOHENY PARK TERRACE HOME-OWNERS ASS'N., INC. v. Truck Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Aliberti v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Sullivan v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API