Legal Opinion

Mock v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1992No. B048249PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

The defendant and appellant, Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company (Michigan Millers), appeals from a judgment entered following a jury verdict in which the plaintiffs Owen R. Mock and Dora Mock (plaintiffs) were awarded compensatory and punitive damages. The action arose out of a claim made by plaintiffs under a policy of homeowner’s insurance issued to them by Michigan Millers.

Plaintiffs asserted that Michigan Millers had unreasonably delayed its investigation, adjustment and payment of that claim and had improperly attempted to condition the ultimate payment which was…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Tomaselli v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API