Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Schettino, J.
Plaintiffs instituted suit in the Superior Court, Law Division, seeking recovery from defendant insurer for damages caused by fire to their home.1 An answer was filed on behalf of defendant asserting the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense. Thereafter, defendant moved for summary judgment based upon the pleadings, plaintiff Arthur A. Peloso’s answers to interrogatories, and an affidavit of defendant’s counsel. The trial court, finding that no genuine issue regarding any material fact existed and that the complaint had not been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lardas v. Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Proc v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Sager Glove Corporation v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Finkelstein v. AMERICAN INS. CO. OF NEWARKSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Phoenix Insurance Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
3Cited by90 opinions
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Zaccardi v. BeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- W v. Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.