Turnpike Realty Co. v. Town of Dedham
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.
The petitioner, the owner of 61.9 acres of land in Dedham, brought this petition in the Land Court under the provisions of G. L. c. 185, § 1 (j%), and c. 240, § 14A, to determine, inter alla, the validity of an amendment to a zoning by-law as applied to the land of the petitioner. The judge in his decision ruled that the by-law “was a valid exercise of the authority and powers conferred upon the respondent . . . by . . . [G. L. c.] 40A and is in full force and effect as to the petitioner’s land.” The case is here on the petitioner’s exceptions to several of the judge’s findings and to his…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- DiMarzo v. American Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Buechel v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Sturges v. Town of ChilmarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- John Donnelly & Sons, Inc. v. Outdoor Advertising BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.