Delaney v. Dahl
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Joseph V. Delaney appeals from a judgment on a binding arbitration award. We affirm because (1) the arbitrator had authority to award attorney fees against Delaney in the arbitration, (2) the arbitrator could amend the final arbitration award to add Delaney’s name to the disposition section, and (3) the amendment to add Delaney’s name was timely.
The arbitrator, in considering whether to award attorney fees against Delaney, interpreted the parties’ contract and considered evidence presented at the arbitration hearing. The arbitrator decided attorney fees should be awarded…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Moshonov v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Moore v. First Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richey v. Autonation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Roehl v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Law Offices of David S. Karton v. SegretoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.