Legal Opinion

Moshonov v. Walsh

California Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2000No. S076103PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

The multiparty dispute arising out of a real estate purchase was submitted, on stipulation of all parties, to binding arbitration. The arbitrator found for defendants, the sellers. Although the real estate purchase agreement contained a clause providing for reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party in an “arbitration or suit. . . brought to enforce the terms of this contract or any obligation herein,” and although the arbitrator found defendants were the prevailing parties on the complaint and on a cross-complaint, the arbitrator refused to award defendants any fees,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. DiMarco v. ChaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Creative Plastering, Inc. v. Hedley Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pierotti v. TorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Ajida Technologies, Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Moore v. First Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API