Moshonov v. Walsh
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
The multiparty dispute arising out of a real estate purchase was submitted, on stipulation of all parties, to binding arbitration. The arbitrator found for defendants, the sellers. Although the real estate purchase agreement contained a clause providing for reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party in an “arbitration or suit. . . brought to enforce the terms of this contract or any obligation herein,” and although the arbitrator found defendants were the prevailing parties on the complaint and on a cross-complaint, the arbitrator refused to award defendants any fees,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- DiMarco v. ChaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Creative Plastering, Inc. v. Hedley Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
3Cited by53 opinions
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Pierotti v. TorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Ajida Technologies, Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Moore v. First Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.