Legal Opinion

Mitton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1936No. 8089PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

The indictment in this case charged appellant with selling “malt and intoxicating liquor, to wit, beer,” to an Indian ward of the government under charge of an Indian superintendent and, in a separate count, charged him with introducing such liquor into the Indian country (R.S. § 2139, 25 U.S.C.A. § 241).1 Appellant was arraigned, pleaded not guilty, waived trial by jury, was tried by the court without a jury, and, having been convicted and sentenced, prosecutes this appeal.

The record shows, without conflict or dispute, that appellant introduced into the Fort Peck…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  2. Stubbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  3. Deupree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  4. Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hemphill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API