Legal Opinion
Stubbs v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1924No. 4236PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under the Harrison Narcotic Act (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q). The indictment contains two counts. The first count charges that on the 8th day of November, 1923, at the city of Tacoma, in the Southern division of the Western district of Washington, then and there being, the plaintiff in error did knowingly, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously, and not in the original stamped package or from the original stamped package, purchase from a person whose name was to the grand jurors unknown certain described narcotic…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Braden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Bilboa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Wong SingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pounds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Casey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Case v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Gray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.