Love v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The information under which appellant was convicted charges that appellant “did knowingly, wilfully and unlawfully solicit from one Charles F. Dycer, the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for personal emolument, in consideration of the promise of use of influence of said Harrison A. Love in behalf of the said Charles F. Dycer in obtaining an appointive office under the Government of the United States, to-wit: Chief Inspector of Aeronautics of the Department of Commerce of the United States.” 18 US CA § 150.
The appellant assigns twenty-three errors. His brief…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Caldwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Allen v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Cummings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Curtis v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Jordon v. BondyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Chevillard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Swanne Soon Young Pang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.