Legal Opinion
Deupree v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 27, 1924No. 4265PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It has been repeatly held by this court that, where a motion for a directed verdict is made upon the conclusion of the case for the government, and denied, with a reserved exception, and the defendant proceeds to introduce evidence on his own behalf, without renewing upon the close of all of the evidence the motion before made, the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be reviewed by the appellate court. United States v. McDonald (D. C.) 293 F. 433; Clark v. United States, 245 F. 112, 157 C. C. A. 408; Thlinket Packing Co. v. United States, 236 F. 109, 149 C.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Rosen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Rich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Storgard v. France & Canada S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baldwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Feather River Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Hemphill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Critzer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Tudor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.