Legal Opinion

Marco v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1928No. 5386PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under two counts of an information charging the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and the unlawful maintenance of a common nuisance. The grounds for reversal are insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, double jeopardy, and misconduct on the part of certain members of the jury.

The sufficiency of the testimony to support the verdict was not raised at the conclusion of all the testimony in the court below, and for that reason the question is not properly before us for review.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Singer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  3. Bowers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  4. Stoecko v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  2. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. Molina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  5. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API