Legal Opinion

Golden Condor, Inc. v. Bell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1987No. 16461PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Pro se appellant, Velma Bell, appeals from a judgment of the district court which, after remand from the Court of Appeals, again quieted title to four unpatented mining claims in respondent, Golden Condor, Inc. Mrs. Bell contends that the district court’s decision on remand is not supported by the evidence in the record. For the reasons explained below, we disagree and affirm the district court’s judgment.

Golden Condor obtained title to four unpatented mining claims, denominated the Mountain Lion, Burton, E.R. Fields, and John Rogers, via quitclaim deed executed by Alfred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Masters v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Nycum v. Triangle Dairy Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pointner v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. SimaIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Golay v. LoomisIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Everhart v. Washington County Road & Bridge DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ade v. BattenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Litz v. RobinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API