Legal Opinion

State v. Sima

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1977No. 12338PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from Francis Sima’s conviction for violation of I.C. § 18-6710, making repeated anonymous telephone calls with the intent to annoy. We affirm. Appellant was charged with the offense and tried before a magistrate sitting without a jury. He was found guilty, convicted and sentenced to a suspended ten day sentence and the payment of a $50.00 fine. On appeal to the district court that conviction was affirmed.

Other than the alleged facts set forth in appellant’s brief, we are without a record since appellant has failed to provide a reporter’s transcript. Upon appeal, appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scafco Boise, Inc. v. RigbyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. MurinkoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. BeasonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. ClarkIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Golay v. LoomisIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API