Legal Opinion

Golay v. Loomis

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1990No. 18303PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

This case is before us on a petition for review from the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals reversed a district court appellate decision which had upheld a magistrate’s decision granting plaintiff Golay's motion for summary judgment on the ground that the motion had not been opposed by affidavit or other sworn statement as required by I.R.C.P. 56. We affirm the district court’s appellate decision and vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals. In so doing, we conclude that the magistrate did not err in granting summary judgment under I.R.C.P. 56, and also did not err…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Esther HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Camp v. JiminezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Newbold v. ArvidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Twin Falls County v. CoatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Landberg v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Landberg v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Everhart v. Washington County Road & Bridge DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API