Legal Opinion

Nycum v. Triangle Dairy Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1985No. 15409PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission denying appellant’s claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. Appellant contends that his flexor tenosynovitis (impairment of tendons in the hand) was contracted as a result of his employment with respondent Triangle Dairy. The commission found otherwise and held that his hand condition was causally related to appellant’s diabetes and not to his employment. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the commission’s order was supported by substantial, competent evidence and therefore affirm the order denying…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Baldner v. Bennett's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Webster v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Borah v. McCandlessIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Warren v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bantz v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Olvera v. Del's Auto BodyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Nelson v. Ponsness-Warren Idgas EnterprisesIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API