Legal Opinion

Root v. County of Onondaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claim based upon an alleged violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). *1015We have consistently held that absolute liability under that section may be imposed only upon a showing that the injured worker fell from an elevated work surface or was struck by an object falling from an elevated work surface (see, Staples v Town of Amherst, 146 AD2d 292, 293; Fox v Jenny Eng’g Corp., 122 AD2d 532,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. DaBolt v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Celestine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Staples v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Kerr v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Balthazar v. Full Circle Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Ruiz v. 8600 Roll Road, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Butt v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Oakes v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Perry v. National Structures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API