DaBolt v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Denman, J.
The question raised in this appeal is whether an employee of a contractor may seek redress under section 200, subdivision 1 of section 240 and subdivision 6 of section 241 of the Labor Law against the owner of the real property on which he sustained serious physical injury during the course of his employment. For reasons stated herein we conclude that he may be able to recover under section 200 and subdivision 6 of section 241 but, in the factual context here, he does not have a cause of action under subdivision 1 of section 240.
*71Appellant Bethlehem Steel…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Long v. Forest-FehlhaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Monroe v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Smith v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Copertino v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mack v. Altmans Stage Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Nagel v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.