Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion and denying defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Plaintiff was injured while he was helping to guide a 45-foot metal bar with a tag line that was wrapped around his hand. At that time, the tag line became wedged in a gap in the hand rail and tightened around plaintiff’s hand, causing severe injuries. Because plaintiff’s injury was not the result of a fall from a height or a falling…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Staples v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Root v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Shaffer v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Finch Pruyn & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995
  2. Soles v. Eastman Kodak Co.New York Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Desjardins v. Auburn Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API