Legal Opinion

Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & Son

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1981PublishedCited by 532 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wachtler, J.

The question presented on this appeal is whether various prime contractors not in privity with the general contractor of a construction project may be held liable under sections 200, 240 and 241 of the Labor Law for construction site injuries sustained by a workman employed by the general contractor in the course of completing work for which the general contractor was solely responsible. We agree with the Appellate Division that the prime contractors incur no liability for personal injuries arising out of work not specifically delegated to them.

Plaintiff George…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Page v. La BuzzettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Reynolds v. John T. Brady & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by532 opinions

  1. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Ortega v. PucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Chowdhury v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

527 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API