Legal Opinion

Karnazes v. Ares

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2016No. B246308PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHAVEZ, J.

Elizabeth Karnazes (appellant) appeals from an order granting a special motion to strike appellant’s complaint filed by Ashley D. Posner (respondent) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (anti-SLAPP motion).

We find no error in the trial court’s ruling; therefore we affirm the order.

CONTENTIONS

Appellant makes the following contentions: (1) the trial court violated the law by failing to provide appellant with a copy of the tentative ruling that was provided to respondent prior to oral argument on the anti-SLAPP motion; (2) respondent’s motion was untimely and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Contreras v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Optional Capital, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. San Diegans for Open Gov't v. San Diego State Univ. Research Found., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Contreras v. Dowling, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API