Legal Opinion

Mitchum v. Foster

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 1972No. 70-27PublishedCited by 1,126 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The federal anti-injunction statute provides that a federal .court “may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of. its jurisdiction,, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 1 An Act of Congress, 42 U. S. C. § 1983, expressly authorizes a “suit in equity” to redress “the deprivation,” under color of state law, “of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution . ...”2 The question before us is whether this “Act of Congress” comes within the “expressly authorized” exception…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,126 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

1,121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API