Mitchum v. Foster
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
The federal anti-injunction statute provides that a federal .court “may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of. its jurisdiction,, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 1 An Act of Congress, 42 U. S. C. § 1983, expressly authorizes a “suit in equity” to redress “the deprivation,” under color of state law, “of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution . ...”2 The question before us is whether this “Act of Congress” comes within the “expressly authorized” exception…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,126 opinions
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
1,121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.