Legal Opinion
Optional Capital, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 16, 2017No. B275274PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
*101Optional Capital, Inc. (Optional or Plaintiff) sued various entities and individuals, including DAS Corporation (DAS) and its counsel-Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (Akin) and Parker Shumaker Mills LLP, David Parker and William Mills (collectively, Parker) (collectively with Akin, Defendants)-for conversion and fraudulent transfer. Plaintiff sought to recover from Defendants on theories of vicarious liability (conspiracy and aiding and abetting).
In response, Defendants, pursuant to section 425.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1 filed special motions to strike all claims asserted against…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Newport Harbor Offices & Marina, LLC v. Evangelism, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Symmonds v. Mahoney, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Richmond Compassionate Care Collective v. 7 Stars Holistic Found., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- BLT Communications, LLC v. LaMarche CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Bonni v. St. Joseph Health SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.