Legal Opinion

Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2016No. G052660PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.—

INTRODUCTION

A special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, 1 is to be filed “within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the court’s discretion, at any later time upon terms it deems proper.” (§425.16, subd. (I).) 2 In this case, we address whether an anti-SLAPP motion was timely when it was filed within 60 days of service of a third amended complaint and no previous anti-SLAPP motion had been filed. We conclude the filing of an amended complaint does not automatically reopen the period for bringing an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Williams Hicks v. Pga Tour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Newport Harbor Offices & Marina, LLC v. Evangelism, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Copenbarger v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Al-Ahmed v. Twitter, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API