Legal Opinion
Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 4, 1993No. Court No. 91-07-00530PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Judge:
Plaintiff, Federal-Mogul Corporation (“Federal-Mogul”), commenced this action to challenge certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“ITA”) .final results in the first administrative review of imports of antifriction bearings from Japan. Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews (“FinalResults”), 56 Fed. Reg. 31,754 (1991). Substantive issues raised by the parties in the underlying administrative proceeding were addressed by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Federal Mogul Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- The Torrington Company, and Federal-Mogul Corporation v. The United States, and Skf USA Inc. And Skf (u.k.) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- National Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.