Legal Opinion
INA Walzlager Schaeffler KG v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 3, 1997No. Consolidated Court No. 95-03-00318PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:
Plaintiffs and defendant-intervenors INA Walzlager Schaeffler KG and INA Bearing Company, Inc. (collectively “INA”), FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG and FAG Bearings Corporation (collectively “FAG”), and SKF USA Inc. and SKF GmbH (collec*112tively “SKF”) move this Court pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court challenging certain aspects of the final determination of the fourth administrative review of antifriction bearings (“AFBs”) from Germany, entitled Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts ThereofFrom France, et al.; Final…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- NSK Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- SKF USA Inc. v. INA Walzlager Schaeffler KGCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Hyundai Electronics Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.