Legal Opinion

Torrington Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 29, 1993No. Court No. 91-08-00569PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Tsoucalas, Judge:

Plaintiff, The Torrington Company (“Torring-ton”), commenced this action to challenge certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“ITA”) final results in the first administrative review of imports of antifriction bearings from Japan. Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From Japan; Final Results of Antidump-ing Duty Administrative Reviews (“FinalResults”), 56 Fed. Reg. 31,754 (1991). Substantive issues raised by the parties in the underlying administrative proceeding were addressed by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  5. Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Federal Mogul Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  5. Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API