Legal Opinion

Suarez v. Pierard

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 1996No. 3 — 95 — 0384PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

Plaintiff Amy Suarez filed a two-count complaint against defendants James Pierard and K mart Corporation. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1992)). The trial court dismissed the complaint but granted leave to amend count II. Subsequently, count II was also dismissed for failure to state a cause of action and this appeal followed. We affirm.

According to the allegations contained in plaintiff’s complaint, on December 13, 1992, plaintiff went to the pharmacy at a K mart store to have a prescription filled. The prescription…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Zadrozny v. City CollegesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Stinson v. Physicians Immediate Care, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. In Re Estate of MilbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Zadrozny v. City Colleges of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Siddiqui v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Ahsan v. Eagle, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Evans v. Rite Aid Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Anonymous v. CVS Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Automotive Finance Corp. v. Ridge Chrysler Plymouth L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API