Automotive Finance Corp. v. Ridge Chrysler Plymouth L.L.C.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Automotive Finance Corporation (“Automotive”) has filed a two-count complaint against Ridge Chrysler Plymouth, L.L.C. (“Ridge”) and Gerald Gorman (“Gorman”), claiming that Ridge and Gorman have failed to comply with a contractually specified prepayment penalty 1 in violation of Illinois and Indiana law. Because both sides have viewed the issues posed by this case as purely legal rather than factual in nature, each has now filed a Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 summary judgment motion. 2 But for the reasons set forth in this opinion, each…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clyde Pugh v. City of Attica, Indiana, Attica Police Department, Attica Board of WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Ronald Lesch v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Lake River Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Carborundum Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nisselson v. Empyrean Investment Fund, L.P. (In Re MarketXT Holdings Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re AE Hotel VentureUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- River East Plaza, L.L.C. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Mau v. L.A. Fitness International, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Municipal Trust & Savings Bank v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.