Legal Opinion

Ziemba v. Mierzwa

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1991No. 69949PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The issue presented in this case is whether a landowner has a duty to maintain his property in such a manner that his driveway is visible to travelers on an adjacent roadway. We hold that there is no such duty.

On August 9, 1988, plaintiff, Joseph Ziemba, filed a four-count amended complaint in the circuit court of McHenry County. Plaintiff was seeking damages for personal injuries he suffered when the bike he was riding collided with a dump truck exiting a driveway owned by defendant, Keith Mierzwa. Count III of the amended complaint sought recovery from defendant for negligence based on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lance v. SeniorIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mieher v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. E & E HAULING, INC.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Abrams v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hills v. Bridgeview Little League Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Gouge v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API