Legal Opinion

Evans v. Rite Aid Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 18, 1996No. 24532PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOÁL, Justice:

This Court granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Evans v. Rite Aid Corp., 317 S.C. 154, 452 S.E.2d 9 (Ct.App.1994), which held that pharmacists do not owe their customers a duty of confidentiality. Further, the opinion rejected Evans’s claim for negligent falsehood. We affirm as modified.

FactuaivProcedural Background

In October 1989, Myra Kay Evans submitted a drug prescription to Rite Aid Pharmacy (“Pharmacy”). She discovered shortly thereafter that a Pharmacy employee had reported to others that Evans’s medication was for the treatment of a venereal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Doe v. American Red Cross Blood ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Suarez v. PierardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jimenez Ex Rel. Estate of Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1999
  2. Anonymous v. CVS Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hurst v. SandyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. South Carolina State Board of Medical Examiners v. HedgepathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Boyle ex rel. Estate of Boyle v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API