Legal Opinion

Stinson v. Physicians Immediate Care, Ltd.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 16, 1995No. 2-94-0969PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger

The plaintiff, Bradford Stinson, suing individually and on behalf of all similarly situated persons, appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging that the defendant, Physicians Immediate Care Limited, was negligent in performing a drug test on him and reporting a false positive result. The central issue for review is one of first impression in Illinois: whether a laboratory which performs drug-screening tests at the behest of an employer owes a duty of care to an employee who submits to a drug test.

In count I, the plaintiff alleged that his employer required him to have a drug-screening…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People Ex Rel. Daley v. Datacom Systems Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Gouge v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. T & S SIGNS, INC. v. Village of WadsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sharpe v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Mission Petroleum Carriers, Inc. v. SolomonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Duncan v. Afton, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Roark v. MacOupin Creek Drainage DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API