Legal Opinion

Percival v. General Motors Corporation

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 16, 1975No. 75-509C(1)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

400 F.Supp. 1322 (1975)

Worth H. PERCIVAL, Plaintiff,

v.

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a corp., Defendant.

No. 75-509C(1).

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

September 16, 1975.

Norman C. Parker, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

James E. McDaniel, Barnard, Baer, Lee, Timm & McDaniel, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

MEREDITH, Chief Judge.

This action is before the Court on defendant's motion for summary judgment. The motion shall be granted.

Plaintiff Worth H. Percival was continuously employed by defendant General Motors Corporation (hereinafter GM) from 1947 to 1973, a period of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Lynas v. Maxwell FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Worth H. Percival v. General Motors Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Whittaker v. Care-More, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API