Whittaker v. Care-More, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNER, Judge.
The issues in this case are whether the employee-at-will rule is still in effect in Tennessee and, if so, whether the plaintiffs-appellants 1 were employees-at-will.
The plaintiffs were discharged from their jobs at the defendants’ Monterey nursing home. Next they applied to the Tennessee Department of Employment Security for unemployment benefits. These benefits were granted.
The plaintiffs then filed this action alleging that they were discharged without “good cause” in “breach of an implied contract for an indefinite term.” The complaint also alleged a retaliatory…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Chism v. Mid-South Milling Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Price v. Mercury Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Forrester v. StockstillTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Gregory v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.