Legal Opinion

Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich Division

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1980No. 1682PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in a trespass action. The issue is what remedies may be available to an employee-at-will who has been discharged by his employer.

I

The principles to be applied in deciding whether to grant a motion for summary judgment are settled:

“Summary judgment is made available by Pa.R.C.P. 1035, 12 P.S. Appendix when the pleadings, depositions answers to interrogatories, admissions on file and supporting affidavits considered together reveal no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Jayne G. Nathanson v. The Medical College of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. John Novosel v. Nationwide Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API