Legal Opinion

Luebbers v. Luebbers

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 5, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this case I decided at the hearing that the title to the property in question should be in the wife, but that the matter should be referred to a master to ascertain what the husband had expended on the property.

The testimony is before me, and the question I have now to consider is whether or not the husband is entitled to any reimbursement for expenditures made on property belonging to his wife.

Counsel has called my attention to the case of Silover v.Silover, 62 N.J. Eq. 761, in which Chief-Justice Gummere, speaking for the court of errors and appeals, says, in effect, that expenditures by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Selover v. SeloverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  2. Hood v. HoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brodzinsky v. PulekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Tillinghast v. HarropSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1939
  3. Gimbel v. VeninoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  4. Bruenn v. SwitlikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  5. Kirby v. KirbySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API