Legal Opinion

Hood v. Hood

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 2, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iakd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kadiscii, Black, Bogert, Vre-

DENBURGH, IÍEPPENHEIMER, WlLLÍAMS-12.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  2. Ross v. RossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. TurroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Rosecrans v. RosecransNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  5. Luebbers v. LuebbersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API