Legal Opinion
Brodzinsky v. Pulek
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 7, 1962PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
75 N.J. Super. 40 (1962)
182 A.2d 149
EMILY BRODZINSKY, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF STANLEY PULEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ISABELLA PULEK, BLOOMFIELD SAVINGS BANK, A BANKING INSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND PEDDIE REALTY COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 7, 1962.
Decided June 7, 1962.
Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.
Mr. Lester Sandles argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Sandles, on the brief; Mr. A. Nathan Cowen, attorney).
Mr. Victor H. Miles argued the cause for respondent Isabella Pulek.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abeles v. Adams Engineering Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Downs v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Steinmetz v. SteinmetzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Luebbers v. LuebbersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Papsco v. NovakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Alexander v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Nesta v. MeyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Shell Oil Co. v. MarinelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Central State Bank v. Hudik-Ross Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.