Legal Opinion

Vingiano v. Vitolo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 14, 1968No. File No. CV 8-662-4396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.

We first consider a motion made to this court to set aside the judgment on the grounds that the plaintiffs have failed to file their briefs within the time provided for by our rules. Practice Book § 1015. The motion was heard and decision reserved, and the parties were permitted to argue the merits of the appeal. In support of their motion, the defendants cite § 696 of the Practice Book, which section has been incorporated by reference as a rule of this court. Practice Book § 1023. Since the case, however, has been heard upon its merits and the plaintiffs’ brief was then a part of the record,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Klein v. DeRosaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Schroeder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Sachs v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Rischall v. BauchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  5. Phillips v. BonadiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chaput v. ClarkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Bradshaw v. OberlanderDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API