Legal Opinion

Chaput v. Clarke

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 3, 1992No. 10078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

This appeal arises from the plaintiffs’ action seeking an injunction barring the defendant from closing, obstructing, or interfering with the plaintiffs’ use of a right-of-way that crosses the defendant’s land. The trial court granted the injunction and awarded nominal damages to the plaintiffs. The defendant raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the town of Scotland created an easement or right-of-way when it voted to close old Khourie Road on July 10,1947, and (2), if such an easement or right-of-way was created, whether the deed conveying the plaintiffs’ property to them was sufficient…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Antenucci v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Luf v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Schroeder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Blanchard v. MaxsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. C. B. Alling Realty Co. v. OldermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simonds v. ShawConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Savalle v. HILZINGERConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Learned v. Ward, No. Cv-97-0540765 (Apr. 19, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API