Legal Opinion
Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Linear Technologies Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided January 15, 2002No. 1:01-cr-00004PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FOLSOM, District Judge.
The motion before the Court concerns the construction of three patents assigned to Plaintiff Texas Instruments, Inc. (“TI”), U.S. Patent Nos. 4,884,674 (“674 Patent”), 5,216,613 (“613 Patent”) and 6,039,168 (“168 Patent”)(collectively, “the Subject Patents”). TI brings suit against Defendant Linear Technologies Corp. (“LTC”) for the infringement of the three patents. Two of the patents, the ’674 and ’613 Patents, have been the subject of at least two prior actions. TI argues that based on construction of the claims in these patents already effectuated by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Inpro II Licensing, S.A.R.L. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Visto Corp. v. Sproqit Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Verizon California Inc. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.